were-so-confused-the-problems-with-food-and-exercise-studies.html
link
summary
This New York Times article examines the confusing and contradictory nature of food and exercise studies. It highlights the challenges of interpreting and applying research findings in these fields, which often provide conflicting recommendations. The article discusses various factors that contribute to this confusion, including conflicting study designs, small sample sizes, the influence of industry funding, and the complexity of human biology. It emphasizes the importance of critically evaluating study findings and considering the broader context when making decisions about diet and exercise. Overall, the article serves as a reminder to approach food and exercise studies with caution and to rely on a variety of sources for well-rounded information.