malcolm_gladwell_s_10_000_hour_rule_for_deliberate_practice_is_wrong_genes.html

4/27/2017

In this thought-provoking article, the author challenges Malcolm Gladwell's popular theory of the "10,000-hour rule" for achieving mastery in a skill through deliberate practice. The article argues that while deliberate practice is indeed important for skill development, it is not the sole determinant of success. The author suggests that genetic factors, such as innate ability and talent, play a significant role in achieving expertise in a particular field. They cite several studies that support the idea that genetics can be a crucial factor in determining skill proficiency. The article encourages a more nuanced understanding of skill acquisition, emphasizing the interplay between genetics and deliberate practice.

self-improvement ꞏ personal development ꞏ achievement ꞏ high achievers ꞏ talent optimization ꞏ talent management ꞏ success ꞏ expertise building ꞏ malcolm gladwell ꞏ skill transfer ꞏ skill acquisition ꞏ talent development programs ꞏ talent selection ꞏ performance psychology ꞏ genetics ꞏ expert performance ꞏ success factors ꞏ talent vs effort ꞏ expertise ꞏ performance ꞏ performance improvement ꞏ mastery ꞏ genetic influence ꞏ peak performance ꞏ goal setting ꞏ talent identification ꞏ deliberate practice theory ꞏ training ꞏ talent development ꞏ innate ability ꞏ skill development ꞏ performance measurement ꞏ talent cultivation ꞏ myth debunking ꞏ talent vs hard work ꞏ practice effect ꞏ success strategies ꞏ outliers ꞏ learning curves ꞏ nature vs nurture ꞏ genetic determinism ꞏ deliberate practice ꞏ learning ꞏ talent ꞏ motivation ꞏ talent discovery ꞏ expertise development ꞏ cognitive abilities