malcolm_gladwell_s_10_000_hour_rule_for_deliberate_practice_is_wrong_genes.html

4/27/2017

In this thought-provoking article, the author challenges Malcolm Gladwell's popular theory of the "10,000-hour rule" for achieving mastery in a skill through deliberate practice. The article argues that while deliberate practice is indeed important for skill development, it is not the sole determinant of success. The author suggests that genetic factors, such as innate ability and talent, play a significant role in achieving expertise in a particular field. They cite several studies that support the idea that genetics can be a crucial factor in determining skill proficiency. The article encourages a more nuanced understanding of skill acquisition, emphasizing the interplay between genetics and deliberate practice.

deliberate practice ꞏ expertise ꞏ talent ꞏ success ꞏ skill acquisition ꞏ learning ꞏ performance ꞏ outliers ꞏ talent vs hard work ꞏ myth debunking ꞏ malcolm gladwell ꞏ expertise development ꞏ deliberate practice theory ꞏ innate ability ꞏ genetic influence ꞏ practice effect ꞏ mastery ꞏ performance improvement ꞏ training ꞏ skill development ꞏ nature vs nurture ꞏ talent development ꞏ expert performance ꞏ genetic determinism ꞏ talent identification ꞏ talent cultivation ꞏ cognitive abilities ꞏ talent vs effort ꞏ genetics ꞏ performance psychology ꞏ learning curves ꞏ high achievers ꞏ talent discovery ꞏ performance measurement ꞏ goal setting ꞏ self-improvement ꞏ personal development ꞏ success factors ꞏ talent development programs ꞏ talent selection ꞏ talent management ꞏ achievement ꞏ motivation ꞏ peak performance ꞏ skill transfer ꞏ talent optimization ꞏ expertise building ꞏ success strategies