How to Do Code Reviews Like a Human (Part One)

How to Do Code Reviews Like a Human (Part One)

10/20/2017

link

https://mtlynch.io/human-code-reviews-1/

summary

In this blog post, the author discusses the benefits and challenges of conducting human code reviews in software development. The article emphasizes the importance of code reviews as a means of improving code quality, catching bugs, and promoting knowledge sharing within a team. It outlines the different roles involved in a code review, including the author, reviewer, and moderator, and provides guidelines for effective code reviews. The author also addresses common challenges that teams may face during the code review process and offers solutions for overcoming them. Overall, the article highlights the value of human code reviews in ensuring software reliability and fostering collaboration among developers.

tags

code reviews ꞏ software development ꞏ collaboration ꞏ best practices ꞏ software engineering ꞏ code quality ꞏ peer programming ꞏ teamwork ꞏ code optimization ꞏ bug fixing ꞏ software testing ꞏ coding standards ꞏ communication ꞏ software architecture ꞏ programming techniques ꞏ problem solving ꞏ technical skills ꞏ learning ꞏ knowledge sharing ꞏ professional development ꞏ feedback ꞏ code efficiency ꞏ coding conventions ꞏ code readability ꞏ code complexity ꞏ continuous improvement ꞏ productivity ꞏ software reliability ꞏ code maintainability ꞏ coding style ꞏ quality assurance ꞏ software projects ꞏ software industry ꞏ development workflow ꞏ coding guidelines ꞏ software performance ꞏ software maintenance ꞏ software documentation ꞏ code analysis ꞏ code refactoring ꞏ software debugging ꞏ code documentation ꞏ software design ꞏ code organization ꞏ code review process