Science Isn’t Broken

9/26/2015

In this article, the author addresses the common perception that science is broken and unreliable. They argue that while science is not perfect, it is still a reliable system for understanding the world. The author discusses some well-known cases of scientific misconduct and issues within the scientific community, but emphasizes that these are exceptions rather than the rule. They highlight the self-correcting nature of science through replication and peer review, showcasing how mistakes and biases are eventually corrected. In conclusion, the article aims to restore trust in the scientific process and highlight the importance of evidence-based reasoning.

science journalism ꞏ scientific research ꞏ data analysis ꞏ scientific method ꞏ research methodology ꞏ scientific integrity ꞏ replication crisis ꞏ peer review ꞏ statistical analysis ꞏ data interpretation ꞏ scientific publishing ꞏ scientific communication ꞏ scientific skepticism ꞏ data-driven journalism ꞏ science reporting ꞏ scientific studies ꞏ scientific findings ꞏ scientific community ꞏ evidence-based ꞏ scientific process ꞏ science education ꞏ scientific literacy ꞏ scientific rigor ꞏ scientific consensus ꞏ research ethics ꞏ scientific investigation ꞏ scientific inquiry ꞏ scientific objectivity ꞏ scientific transparency ꞏ scientific misconduct ꞏ scientific advancements