Dragonslayer

1/15/2016

This article discusses the use of a surveillance device called Stingray by law enforcement agencies, focusing on the Daniel Rigmaiden case. Stingray is a cell phone tracking tool that mimics a cellular tower to collect data from nearby devices. The article explains how Rigmaiden, a tax fraud suspect, discovered the use of Stingray during his investigation and challenged its legality. It delves into the legal implications and controversies surrounding the use of Stingray, such as potential Fourth Amendment violations and the secretive nature of its deployment. The article also highlights the broader implications of Stingray technology on privacy and civil liberties.

surveillance ꞏ privacy ꞏ stingray ꞏ law enforcement ꞏ technology ꞏ civil liberties ꞏ privacy invasion ꞏ government ꞏ data collection ꞏ cellular networks ꞏ privacy rights ꞏ fourth amendment ꞏ tracking devices ꞏ digital privacy ꞏ electronic surveillance ꞏ privacy concerns ꞏ police ꞏ privacy laws ꞏ surveillance technology ꞏ mobile phone tracking ꞏ privacy issues ꞏ privacy protection ꞏ government surveillance ꞏ surveillance state ꞏ digital rights ꞏ location tracking ꞏ data privacy ꞏ surveillance devices ꞏ privacy infringement ꞏ personal privacy ꞏ surveillance society ꞏ online privacy ꞏ privacy violations ꞏ privacy advocates ꞏ privacy policy ꞏ privacy legislation ꞏ privacy debate ꞏ surveillance equipment ꞏ privacy awareness ꞏ privacy implications ꞏ privacy threats ꞏ surveillance techniques ꞏ privacy rights activists ꞏ mobile privacy