Why decentralized social networking never makes it — ever heard of Crossing the Chasm?

Why decentralized social networking never makes it — ever heard of Crossing the Chasm?

9/10/2018

link

https://upon2020.com/blog/2018/08/why-decentralized-social-networking-never-makes-it-ever-heard-of-crossing-the-chasm/

summary

In this blog post, the author discusses why decentralized social networking platforms have struggled to gain mainstream adoption. The post references Geoffrey Moore's concept of "crossing the chasm" and applies it to the decentralized social networking landscape. It explains that while decentralized platforms offer advantages such as data ownership and privacy, they face challenges in terms of user experience, network effects, and scalability. The author argues that in order for decentralized social networking to succeed, it needs to overcome these barriers and offer compelling solutions that appeal to a broader audience. The post provides insights into the complexities and obstacles associated with decentralized social networking.

tags

decentralized social networking ꞏ social media ꞏ technology ꞏ networking ꞏ online communities ꞏ social networks ꞏ decentralization ꞏ internet ꞏ privacy ꞏ data ownership ꞏ social platforms ꞏ digital identity ꞏ network effects ꞏ digital communities ꞏ social interactions ꞏ peer-to-peer ꞏ user experience ꞏ trust ꞏ data security ꞏ social networking history ꞏ technology adoption ꞏ disruptive technologies ꞏ innovation ꞏ blockchain ꞏ distributed systems ꞏ social network platforms ꞏ user engagement ꞏ online privacy ꞏ social networking platforms ꞏ user behavior ꞏ information sharing ꞏ network infrastructure ꞏ online communication ꞏ technology trends ꞏ digital society ꞏ social media platforms ꞏ data protection ꞏ internet culture ꞏ user empowerment ꞏ social impact ꞏ social connection ꞏ data privacy ꞏ technology ethics ꞏ online safety ꞏ platform governance ꞏ user participation ꞏ network scalability ꞏ technology regulation ꞏ user control ꞏ data sovereignty