History - 2100
Note
wait. does this mean we have to wait till 2100? (note: i did not read the other chapters, just this section on the history of this line of thinking...)
i do feel that a lot of history is incorrectly taught as (a) a time line of events (b) a timeline only of forward progress (c) a timeline of inevitables
all of this culminates in a misunderstanding of why we have what we have today, a disconnect from who we were as a society previously and a lacking a strong motive to revisit past ideas that may not have worked out previously.
i'm not so sure mutualism and socialism through market means would work out. but there are edges to any theory of economy and gaurdrails have their values.
with that said, it would be helpful for those that are in power today to have to answer the question: could we do something better. and then for us to collectively try it.