Why Sign-Language Gloves Don't Help Deaf People

5/11/2022

This article discusses the limitations of sign language gloves and their effectiveness in helping deaf individuals communicate. It highlights how these gloves, which translate sign language into written or spoken words, are often seen as a technological solution to bridge the communication gap. However, it argues that such gloves overlook the complexities of sign language and the cultural aspects associated with it. The article points out that sign language is not a direct translation of spoken language, but a distinct and nuanced form of communication. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and supporting the use of sign language as a valuable and legitimate means of communication for the deaf community.

challenges faced by deaf people ꞏ disability rights ꞏ technology and society ꞏ barriers to communication ꞏ assistive tools ꞏ technological innovation ꞏ technological advancements ꞏ assistive devices ꞏ deaf culture ꞏ wearable technology ꞏ assistive communication ꞏ assistive solutions ꞏ human-computer interaction ꞏ accessibility solutions ꞏ inclusion in technology ꞏ language barriers ꞏ technology limitations ꞏ sign language barriers ꞏ deaf community ꞏ digital divide ꞏ deaf education ꞏ sign language interpretation ꞏ deaf advocacy ꞏ innovation in sign language ꞏ sign language development ꞏ limitations of technology ꞏ advancements in assistive technology ꞏ hearing impairment ꞏ accessibility ꞏ disability inclusion ꞏ assistive technology ꞏ inclusive design ꞏ technology and disabilities ꞏ sign language recognition ꞏ limitations of sign language gloves ꞏ communication devices ꞏ gesture recognition ꞏ deafness ꞏ haptic feedback ꞏ communication barriers ꞏ sign language ꞏ limitations of sign language interpretation ꞏ accessibility technology