Why Are Economists Giving Piketty the Cold Shoulder?

Why Are Economists Giving Piketty the Cold Shoulder?

7/17/2019

link

https://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/marshall-steinbaum-why-are-economists-giving-piketty-cold-shoulder

summary

In this article, the author discusses the reception and critique of Thomas Piketty's book 'Capital in the Twenty-First Century' within the field of economics. The author highlights the controversy and backlash the book received from some economists, despite its groundbreaking analysis on wealth inequality. The article explores potential reasons for this skepticism, including ideological differences and methodological concerns. It argues that the resistance to Piketty's work reveals a deeper disconnect between mainstream economists and the reality of rising inequality. Ultimately, the author suggests that economists should engage more seriously with Piketty's research in order to address the pressing issue of economic inequality.

tags

economic inequality ꞏ thomas piketty ꞏ economists ꞏ economic theory ꞏ income distribution ꞏ wealth inequality ꞏ social science ꞏ academic discourse ꞏ economic research ꞏ economic policy ꞏ economics profession ꞏ criticism ꞏ academic debates ꞏ income disparities ꞏ wealth disparities ꞏ capitalism ꞏ wealth concentration ꞏ economic analysis ꞏ economic models ꞏ economic trends ꞏ income mobility ꞏ economic growth ꞏ economic factors ꞏ economic development ꞏ class divisions ꞏ economic data ꞏ economic measurements ꞏ income gaps ꞏ wealth gaps ꞏ economic research methods ꞏ economic studies ꞏ economic experts ꞏ economic perspectives ꞏ economic debates ꞏ economic theories ꞏ economic class ꞏ economic systems ꞏ economic inequality solutions ꞏ labor market ꞏ economic theory criticism ꞏ economic reform ꞏ economic ideologies ꞏ economic issues ꞏ economic frameworks ꞏ economic policies ꞏ economic disparities ꞏ economic impact ꞏ economic consequences