Who’s to Judge?

11/24/2015

This New Yorker article examines the complex issue of judicial elections and the role of money in shaping the outcomes of these elections. It highlights a specific case in Wisconsin where a state Supreme Court justice is facing a well-funded opponent in a fiercely contested race. The article raises concerns about the influence of campaign contributions on the independence and impartiality of judges. It also delves into the historical context of judicial elections in the United States, discussing the shift from an appointment-based system to popular elections. Overall, the article provides a thought-provoking analysis of the challenges and implications of electing judges in modern democracy.

civil justice ꞏ court ꞏ legal ethics ꞏ legal system equality ꞏ legal controversies ꞏ legal system critique ꞏ social justice ꞏ legal accountability ꞏ fairness ꞏ legal decisions ꞏ judicial discretion ꞏ legal system flaws ꞏ judicial restraint ꞏ legal system challenges ꞏ legal system effectiveness ꞏ constitutional law ꞏ legal system efficiency ꞏ law ꞏ legal reform ꞏ legal transparency ꞏ legal interpretation ꞏ judicial process ꞏ justice ꞏ legal precedent ꞏ judicial activism ꞏ legal system ꞏ legal system reforms ꞏ judicial independence ꞏ human rights ꞏ civil law ꞏ criminal justice ꞏ legal debates ꞏ legal scholarship ꞏ judges ꞏ criminal law ꞏ legal reasoning ꞏ impartiality ꞏ legal philosophy ꞏ legal writing ꞏ legal education ꞏ legal analysis ꞏ judicial system ꞏ legal profession ꞏ legal judgments