Who’s to Judge?

11/24/2015

This New Yorker article examines the complex issue of judicial elections and the role of money in shaping the outcomes of these elections. It highlights a specific case in Wisconsin where a state Supreme Court justice is facing a well-funded opponent in a fiercely contested race. The article raises concerns about the influence of campaign contributions on the independence and impartiality of judges. It also delves into the historical context of judicial elections in the United States, discussing the shift from an appointment-based system to popular elections. Overall, the article provides a thought-provoking analysis of the challenges and implications of electing judges in modern democracy.

judicial system ꞏ justice ꞏ legal system ꞏ law ꞏ judges ꞏ court ꞏ criminal justice ꞏ civil justice ꞏ criminal law ꞏ civil law ꞏ legal ethics ꞏ legal profession ꞏ legal judgments ꞏ legal decisions ꞏ legal reform ꞏ judicial independence ꞏ fairness ꞏ impartiality ꞏ legal philosophy ꞏ legal analysis ꞏ legal precedent ꞏ legal reasoning ꞏ legal interpretation ꞏ legal scholarship ꞏ legal writing ꞏ legal education ꞏ judicial activism ꞏ judicial restraint ꞏ judicial process ꞏ judicial discretion ꞏ constitutional law ꞏ human rights ꞏ social justice ꞏ legal controversies ꞏ legal debates ꞏ legal system critique ꞏ legal accountability ꞏ legal transparency ꞏ legal system efficiency ꞏ legal system effectiveness ꞏ legal system equality ꞏ legal system flaws ꞏ legal system challenges ꞏ legal system reforms