What the science says

What the science says

5/1/2022

link

https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2022/03/what-the-science-says-could-humans-survive-a-nuclear-war-between-nato-and-russia/

summary

This blog post examines the potential consequences of a nuclear war between NATO and Russia and explores whether humans could survive such an event. It addresses the scientific understanding of the direct and indirect effects of nuclear explosions, including the immediate impact of the blast, radiation exposure, and the long-term environmental consequences. The article highlights studies that suggest a nuclear conflict of this magnitude would have catastrophic effects on the global climate, leading to a nuclear winter and causing widespread destruction of ecosystems and agricultural systems. The author discusses the potential for human survival in underground shelters and the challenges associated with long-term survival in a post-nuclear war scenario. Overall, the article presents a sobering analysis of the devastating consequences of a hypothetical nuclear war.

tags

nuclear war ꞏ global catastrophe ꞏ survival strategy ꞏ nuclear weapons ꞏ warfare ꞏ international relations ꞏ geopolitical conflict ꞏ human survival ꞏ nuclear fallout ꞏ nuclear winter ꞏ nuclear deterrence ꞏ nuclear arms race ꞏ nuclear disarmament ꞏ nuclear proliferation ꞏ nuclear policy ꞏ diplomatic relations ꞏ nato ꞏ russia ꞏ world politics ꞏ global security ꞏ nuclear strategy ꞏ humanitarian crisis ꞏ post-apocalyptic scenario ꞏ radiation effects ꞏ mass destruction ꞏ geopolitical tensions ꞏ military capabilities ꞏ strategic decision-making ꞏ global impact ꞏ scientific research ꞏ risk assessment ꞏ emergency preparedness ꞏ nuclear threat ꞏ global cooperation ꞏ political instability ꞏ arms control ꞏ national security ꞏ military conflict ꞏ global governance ꞏ peacekeeping ꞏ disaster management ꞏ nuclear energy ꞏ nuclear science ꞏ environmental impact ꞏ social consequences ꞏ human rights ꞏ technological advancements ꞏ scientific ethics