Trump’s Opponents Aren’t Arguing for “Open Borders”—But Maybe They Should

12/25/2018

In this opinion piece from The New Yorker, the author discusses the misconception surrounding President Trump's opponents and their stance on immigration. The article argues that Trump's opponents are often accused of arguing for open borders, but the author suggests that maybe they should actually embrace this position. By examining the economic, moral, and political aspects of open borders, the author makes the case that a more open immigration policy could have positive effects and addresses common critiques against it. The article challenges readers to reconsider their perspectives on immigration and engage in a more nuanced discussion.

donald trump ꞏ us politics ꞏ immigration debate ꞏ border security ꞏ open borders ꞏ immigration policy ꞏ political opponents ꞏ us-mexico border ꞏ immigration reform ꞏ trump administration ꞏ immigration enforcement ꞏ immigrant rights ꞏ immigration rhetoric ꞏ political arguments ꞏ policy debates ꞏ political discourse ꞏ public opinion ꞏ immigration advocates ꞏ immigration critics ꞏ us immigration system ꞏ border control ꞏ immigration laws ꞏ immigration controversies ꞏ political strategy ꞏ immigration statistics ꞏ immigration impact ꞏ immigration consequences ꞏ immigration perspectives ꞏ immigration solutions ꞏ immigration proposals ꞏ us immigration history ꞏ immigration patterns ꞏ immigration challenges ꞏ immigration reforms ꞏ immigration policies ꞏ immigration effects ꞏ immigration reform proposals ꞏ border security measures