The Supreme Court Is Allergic To Math
link
summary
In this article, the author discusses how the Supreme Court of the United States tends to avoid cases involving complex mathematical or statistical analysis. The article argues that this avoidance stems from a lack of expertise in quantitative reasoning among the justices. It examines several cases where the Court struggled to grapple with statistical evidence, such as redistricting cases and the consideration of racial bias in criminal cases. The author raises concerns about the implications of the Court's aversion to math, suggesting that it may lead to inadequate decision-making in cases where statistical analysis is crucial. Overall, the article highlights the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's discomfort with mathematical reasoning.