The legality of targeting Soleimani depends on these questions

1/14/2020

In this article, the author examines the legal aspects surrounding the targeted killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani by the United States. The author highlights that the legality of this action largely depends on four key questions: the existence of an armed conflict between the US and Iran, whether Soleimani was a legitimate military target, the principle of proportionality, and the violation of another country's sovereignty. The article explores different perspectives and legal frameworks, shedding light on the complexities and controversies surrounding this issue. Ultimately, the author emphasizes that determining the legality of such actions requires careful examination of international laws and regulations.

political tensions ꞏ war crimes ꞏ us ꞏ targeted killing ꞏ armed forces ꞏ constitutional law ꞏ legality of targeting ꞏ national security ꞏ military action ꞏ international law ꞏ conflict ꞏ intelligence ꞏ military intervention ꞏ executive power ꞏ law of armed conflict ꞏ human rights ꞏ war powers ꞏ military operations ꞏ regional stability ꞏ international justice ꞏ international politics ꞏ geopolitics ꞏ iran ꞏ international norms ꞏ counterterrorism ꞏ united nations ꞏ united states congress ꞏ public opinion ꞏ international agreements ꞏ soleimani ꞏ international relations ꞏ international governance ꞏ assassination ꞏ military strategy ꞏ self-defense ꞏ middle east ꞏ international diplomacy ꞏ international conflict ꞏ drone strike ꞏ legal implications ꞏ global security