The legality of targeting Soleimani depends on these questions

1/14/2020

In this article, the author examines the legal aspects surrounding the targeted killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani by the United States. The author highlights that the legality of this action largely depends on four key questions: the existence of an armed conflict between the US and Iran, whether Soleimani was a legitimate military target, the principle of proportionality, and the violation of another country's sovereignty. The article explores different perspectives and legal frameworks, shedding light on the complexities and controversies surrounding this issue. Ultimately, the author emphasizes that determining the legality of such actions requires careful examination of international laws and regulations.

legality of targeting ꞏ international law ꞏ targeted killing ꞏ military action ꞏ soleimani ꞏ iran ꞏ us ꞏ middle east ꞏ conflict ꞏ geopolitics ꞏ law of armed conflict ꞏ self-defense ꞏ national security ꞏ international relations ꞏ political tensions ꞏ drone strike ꞏ assassination ꞏ military strategy ꞏ counterterrorism ꞏ legal implications ꞏ constitutional law ꞏ executive power ꞏ united nations ꞏ united states congress ꞏ international norms ꞏ war crimes ꞏ human rights ꞏ international justice ꞏ international diplomacy ꞏ global security ꞏ international conflict ꞏ military intervention ꞏ intelligence ꞏ international governance ꞏ international agreements ꞏ war powers ꞏ international politics ꞏ armed forces ꞏ military operations ꞏ public opinion ꞏ regional stability