The Case That Made an Ex-ICE Attorney Realize the Government Was Relying on False “Evidence” Against Migrants

10/7/2019

This article tells the story of Laura Peña, a former attorney for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who became disillusioned with the use of unreliable evidence in immigration cases. Peña stumbled upon fraudulent evidence being used to place individuals on a gang database, which opened her eyes to the devastating consequences for migrants and their families. The article exposes the flaws and lack of due process in the government's reliance on this database, highlighting cases where innocent immigrants were falsely labeled as gang members. Peña's journey is a powerful example of how one person's discovery can lead to a greater understanding of systemic issues within the immigration system.

immigration ꞏ migrant rights ꞏ ice ꞏ government corruption ꞏ false evidence ꞏ gang database ꞏ legal system ꞏ criminal justice ꞏ civil liberties ꞏ immigration enforcement ꞏ law enforcement ꞏ migrant advocacy ꞏ human rights ꞏ racial profiling ꞏ due process ꞏ prosecutorial misconduct ꞏ criminal justice reform ꞏ immigration policy ꞏ immigration law ꞏ immigration detention ꞏ deportation ꞏ immigration court ꞏ asylum seekers ꞏ migrant families ꞏ immigration raids ꞏ border control ꞏ racial bias ꞏ discrimination ꞏ migrant justice ꞏ social justice ꞏ migrant community ꞏ immigrant rights ꞏ immigration issues ꞏ migrant workers ꞏ immigration reform ꞏ immigration system ꞏ migrant detention ꞏ immigration advocates ꞏ immigration lawyers ꞏ immigration debate ꞏ immigration statistics ꞏ detention centers ꞏ migrant crisis ꞏ immigration enforcement policies ꞏ immigration regulations ꞏ immigrant communities ꞏ government accountability