Scientists rise up against statistical significance

Scientists rise up against statistical significance

6/30/2019

link

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9

summary

This article discusses the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve scientific research. It highlights how AI can assist in analyzing large amounts of data, identifying patterns, and making predictions, which can be particularly useful in fields such as biology, chemistry, and physics. The article also acknowledges the challenges and limitations of AI in scientific research, including the need for well-curated datasets and the potential biases that can arise. It concludes by suggesting that while AI has the potential to revolutionize scientific discovery, it should be seen as a complementary tool that works in collaboration with human researchers.

tags

scientific assessment ꞏ scientific community ꞏ scientific ethics ꞏ scientific communication ꞏ scientific citation ꞏ scientific validity ꞏ scientific studies ꞏ open access ꞏ scientific inquiry ꞏ academic journals ꞏ scientific credibility ꞏ scientific investigation ꞏ scientific progress ꞏ peer-reviewed research ꞏ scientific analysis ꞏ scientific innovation ꞏ scientific interpretation ꞏ scientific reproducibility ꞏ scientific evaluation ꞏ scientific reporting ꞏ scientific research ꞏ scientific review ꞏ scientific integrity ꞏ scientific findings ꞏ scientific discovery ꞏ scientific collaboration ꞏ scientific consensus ꞏ scientific publishing ꞏ scientific experiments ꞏ scientific impact ꞏ scientific literature ꞏ scientific debate ꞏ scientific rigor ꞏ scientific transparency ꞏ scientific advancement ꞏ scientific breakthrough ꞏ scientific methodology ꞏ scientific knowledge ꞏ scientific journalism ꞏ scientific data ꞏ scientific publication ꞏ scientific writing ꞏ scientific articles ꞏ scientific accuracy