Peter Doig Says He Didn’t Paint This. Now He Has to Prove It.
link
summary
This article discusses a recent lawsuit involving renowned artist Peter Doig. The lawsuit revolves around a painting believed to have been created by Doig during his time as a young artist. The painting was owned by a former prison official who claimed that Doig had denied its authenticity, causing its value to plummet. However, Doig vehemently denied ever having created the artwork and argued that he is being forced to defend his reputation against a case of mistaken identity. The article delves into the legal complexities of the case and explores the challenges faced by artists when it comes to authenticating their own works. It also highlights the significance of provenance and reputation in the art world. Ultimately, the article raises important questions about the nature of art and the role of artists in preserving their own legacies.