mass-surveillance-silences-minority-opinions-according-to-study
mass-surveillance-silences-minority-opinions-according-to-study
3/28/2016
link
summary
According to a study reported by The Washington Post, mass surveillance has the potential to silence minority opinions. The study, conducted by researchers at Stanford University and UC Berkeley, analyzed the effects of government surveillance on controversial online discussions. The findings suggest that knowledge of surveillance led to a decrease in expressive behavior among individuals who held minority viewpoints. It was observed that people were more likely to self-censor their opinions when they knew they were being monitored. The study raises concerns about the chilling effect that mass surveillance can have on freedom of speech and the diversity of ideas in society.
tags
mass surveillance ꞏ government surveillance ꞏ privacy ꞏ civil liberties ꞏ minority opinions ꞏ freedom of speech ꞏ social media surveillance ꞏ online privacy ꞏ digital rights ꞏ surveillance state ꞏ whistleblowing ꞏ censorship ꞏ democracy ꞏ human rights ꞏ data collection ꞏ surveillance culture ꞏ surveillance capitalism ꞏ surveillance technology ꞏ surveillance society ꞏ surveillance practices ꞏ surveillance ethics ꞏ surveillance studies ꞏ surveillance impact ꞏ surveillance effects ꞏ surveillance research ꞏ surveillance and democracy ꞏ surveillance and privacy ꞏ surveillance and social control ꞏ surveillance and power ꞏ surveillance and inequality ꞏ surveillance and activism ꞏ surveillance and dissent ꞏ surveillance and public opinion ꞏ surveillance and politics ꞏ surveillance and human behavior ꞏ surveillance and technology ꞏ surveillance and media ꞏ internet surveillance ꞏ privacy invasion ꞏ social control ꞏ data privacy ꞏ government control ꞏ political surveillance ꞏ social surveillance ꞏ public surveillance