f25a6b9c-e9fc-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html

3/29/2016

This article from The Washington Post discusses a controversial approach taken by some cities in the United States to reduce violent crime: paying potentially dangerous individuals not to commit violent acts. The article highlights the example of Richmond, California, where the city government implemented the Office of Neighborhood Safety (ONS), which offers monthly stipends, mentorship, and job training to individuals identified as high-risk for involvement in shootings. The article explores the nuances and ethical concerns surrounding this approach, with proponents arguing that it saves lives and reduces crime rates, while critics question the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences. It also raises questions about the role of law enforcement and the criminal justice system in addressing violent crime.

criminal justice reform ꞏ violence prevention ꞏ crime reduction ꞏ community safety ꞏ public policy ꞏ urban crime ꞏ crime prevention programs ꞏ gun violence ꞏ homicide prevention ꞏ community engagement ꞏ social intervention ꞏ public safety ꞏ law enforcement ꞏ crime rates ꞏ criminal justice system ꞏ restorative justice ꞏ community development ꞏ urban issues ꞏ crime control ꞏ crime deterrence ꞏ community empowerment ꞏ peacebuilding ꞏ crime statistics ꞏ community partnerships ꞏ crime policy ꞏ crime prevention strategies ꞏ criminal behavior ꞏ criminal rehabilitation ꞏ crime prevention initiatives ꞏ community-based programs ꞏ gun violence prevention ꞏ crime prevention funding ꞏ urban violence ꞏ community initiatives ꞏ criminal incentives