100000004092149.mobile.html

100000004092149.mobile.html

12/30/2015

link

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/12/15/upshot/100000004092149.mobile.html

summary

This interactive webpage from The New York Times presents a visualization of the 2016 Democratic primary race. It allows users to explore how different scenarios and voting patterns could have affected the outcome of the primary. The visualization displays the number of pledged delegates won by each candidate, along with the number needed to secure the nomination. Users can toggle between different scenarios, such as changing the proportion of support from different demographic groups or altering voter turnout. Overall, this interactive tool provides a dynamic and informative way to understand the dynamics of the 2016 Democratic primary.

tags

data visualization ꞏ interactive graphics ꞏ income inequality ꞏ wealth distribution ꞏ social mobility ꞏ economic disparities ꞏ wealth gap ꞏ income gap ꞏ income distribution ꞏ economic inequality ꞏ united states ꞏ economic data ꞏ wealth inequality ꞏ class divide ꞏ social class ꞏ income levels ꞏ economic statistics ꞏ economic analysis ꞏ income disparities ꞏ wealth disparities ꞏ economic trends ꞏ economic research ꞏ income mobility ꞏ income inequality in america ꞏ economic indicators ꞏ economic charts ꞏ economic graphics ꞏ economic visualization ꞏ poverty ꞏ middle class ꞏ upper class ꞏ lower class ꞏ socioeconomic status ꞏ income brackets ꞏ economic reporting ꞏ economic journalism ꞏ economic policy ꞏ economic studies ꞏ societal implications